How Often Is Planning Permission Refused? UK Statistics for Objectors (2025–2026)

Key figures (England 2025)

• 87% of all planning applications are granted nationally — leaving around 1 in 8 refused.
• Refusal rates vary dramatically by location: some London boroughs grant as few as 66% of decisions.
• Householder applications (extensions, outbuildings) have a slightly higher approval rate than major development.
• Objections don't decide outcomes, but well-evidenced, policy-linked representations do influence officer reports and committee decisions.
• Run a free AI scan to find the strongest grounds for your specific application.

Understanding planning refusal statistics matters whether you are a neighbour trying to stop a harmful development or simply trying to set realistic expectations before you invest time in a detailed objection. This guide draws on official MHCLG data and explains what the numbers mean for objectors.

---

The national picture: how often is planning permission refused?

According to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) live tables on planning application statistics, England's planning authorities decided approximately 280,000–290,000 planning applications in the year to December 2025. Of those:

• 87% were granted (around 244,000–252,000 decisions)
• 13% were refused (around 36,000–38,000 decisions)

In absolute terms, roughly 36,000 to 38,000 applications are refused every year in England. That is a very large number — but it is spread across dozens of different application types, from major housing developments to single-house extensions.

How the rate has changed over time

The 87% national approval rate has been broadly stable over the past decade, fluctuating between 85% and 89% depending on the quarter and economic conditions. During the pandemic years (2020–2021), approval rates dipped slightly as more applications were withdrawn or deferred; by 2022–2024 they returned to the long-run average.

The stability of the national rate masks significant local variation — covered in the next section.

---

Where are planning applications most often refused?

Refusal rates vary enormously between local planning authorities (LPAs). The most recent MHCLG quarterly data (Q3 2025) shows:

Area	Approximate approval rate
National England average	87%
London average	82%
North East	~93%
London Borough of Barking & Dagenham	66%
London Borough of Havering	67%
London Borough of Hounslow	71%
London Borough of Barnet	73%
London Borough of Enfield	75%
Royal Borough of Greenwich	75%
Surrey (Mole Valley district — major housing)	~23% (major only)

What drives higher refusal rates?

Several factors push councils towards higher refusal rates:

1. Constrained land and strong heritage designations — conservation areas, listed buildings, green belt, and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty all increase scrutiny and the likelihood of refusal.
2. Well-resourced planning teams — councils with experienced officers and detailed supplementary planning documents apply policy more rigorously.
3. Proactive pre-application engagement — in areas where pre-application advice is routinely used, fewer speculative or under-cooked applications reach a decision, which paradoxically raises the approval rate by filtering out the weakest cases before submission.
4. Neighbourhood plan designations — areas with adopted neighbourhood plans often have more specific local policies, providing firmer grounds for refusal.
5. Application mix — a council that receives a higher proportion of major controversial applications (large housing schemes, commercial developments) will record a higher refusal rate than one dominated by modest householder works.

Source: MHCLG planning application statistics live tables, Q3 2025. Figures are approximate and updated quarterly.

---

What types of applications are most often refused?

Not all application types have the same refusal rate. The national 13% average hides material differences:

Application type	Approximate refusal rate
Householder (extensions, outbuildings)	~8–10%
Minor applications (small commercial, under 9 homes)	~12–14%
Major residential (10+ homes)	~15–20%
Major commercial	~10–15%
Prior approval for permitted development	~20% (of those where approval is required)
Listed building consent	~10–15%
Advertisement consent	~15–20%

Householder applications — the type most likely to affect neighbours directly — have the lowest refusal rate. Many are straightforward extensions or loft conversions that comply with adopted standards. The minority that are refused typically fail on grounds of design, residential amenity (overlooking, overbearing impact, loss of daylight), or heritage constraints.

Major residential applications have a higher refusal rate because they are more likely to raise policy conflicts — housing land supply, design quality, infrastructure capacity, and ecological impacts are all in play for larger schemes.

---

What do refusal reasons tell objectors?

When an LPA refuses planning permission, it must state formal reasons in the decision notice, each citing the specific policy the proposal conflicts with. Refusal reasons published on the council's public planning register are one of the most useful research tools available to objectors.

How to use refusal reasons in your research

Before writing your objection, search the planning register for:

1. Previously refused applications on the same site — what reasons were given? Are those same issues present in the current proposal?
2. Refused applications for similar developments nearby — what policies did officers cite? Those same policies apply to your case.
3. Officer reports for approved applications — what conditions were imposed and why? Conditions reveal where officers had concerns but felt refusal was disproportionate.

This research takes 20–30 minutes but can transform a generic objection into a site-specific, policy-linked argument that officers take seriously.

---

Do objections actually make a difference?

This is the question most neighbours ask. The honest answer is: it depends on what you write and whether material grounds exist.

What the evidence shows

Planning research consistently finds that:

• Volume of objections alone does not determine outcomes. A planning application is not a vote. Ten objections from the same street that repeat the same general concern carry less weight than one detailed, policy-referenced submission. The Courts have confirmed this principle in numerous judicial reviews.
• Well-evidenced material arguments can change outcomes. Where objectors provide measurable evidence (shadow diagrams, traffic counts, acoustic measurements, comparison with adopted parking standards), officers may adopt that analysis in their reports. If the argument is strong enough, it becomes a formal reason for refusal.
• Committee applications are more sensitive to representation. Applications that go to planning committee — because of officer recommendation for approval where significant objections exist, or because they are "called in" by a councillor — can be influenced by the quality of representations. Members weigh material considerations but also hear from the community directly.
• Conditions are often a product of objections. Even where refusal is unlikely, objections that identify specific risks (inadequate drainage, parking shortfall, noise from plant) can lead to conditions that mitigate the harm. This is a realistic and undervalued outcome of a well-targeted objection.

What objectors can realistically expect

Scenario	How well-written objections help
Application clearly complies with local plan	Limited — policy compliance is the primary test
Application is marginal — close to development plan boundaries	Significant — material arguments can tip the balance
Application goes to planning committee	Strong — members weigh representations directly
Application has a weak noise / highway / drainage assessment	Strong — challenging gaps in submitted evidence is highly effective
Application is purely householder and well-designed	Limited — design and scale objections need to be very specific

The clearest lesson from planning research is that specificity beats volume. An objection that identifies drawing reference ABC-01, notes that the proposed first-floor window is 8.2 metres from a rear bedroom window (below the LPA's 10-metre standard in Policy H9), and requests refusal or an obscure-glazing condition — is far more influential than 50 emails that say the extension is "too big."

---

Refusal by development type: what objectors should know

Extensions and outbuildings

The ~8–10% refusal rate for householder applications means most extensions are approved. Objections succeed most often when:

• The proposal materially exceeds adopted guidelines on separation distances, eaves heights, or daylight angles
• The site is in a conservation area or the building is listed
• The design is genuinely out of character with the established street pattern (where design policies are adopted)

HMO and change of use

Refusal rates for change-of-use applications, including HMOs (houses in multiple occupation), depend heavily on whether Article 4 directions are in force and what local policies say about HMO concentration. In university towns and high-density areas with Article 4 coverage, HMO objections can succeed on parking, amenity, concentration policy, and family housing supply grounds. See the HMO planning objection guide.

Major residential

For major housing schemes, the planning balance between housing supply (the government's strong presumption in favour of development) and local harms is genuinely contested. Where councils are meeting their five-year housing land supply targets, the balance tips more easily towards refusal on amenity, design, or infrastructure grounds. Where housing supply is under pressure, the government's tilted balance makes refusal harder to sustain at appeal.

---

What happens after a refusal?

When planning permission is refused, the applicant can:

1. Revise and resubmit addressing the stated reasons — most LPAs offer pre-application discussions before resubmission, and a revised scheme may address your concerns.
2. Appeal to the Planning Inspectorate — typically within 6 months for householder appeals, 12 months for others. Objectors can and should submit written representations to the Inspector during an appeal.
3. Judicial review — if there is a legal or procedural error, an applicant may seek judicial review. This is rare and expensive.

As an objector, your most important action after a refusal is to monitor the planning register for a resubmission. Watch for:

• A new application on the same site (you will need to check the register manually or sign up for planning alerts)
• Amended plans uploaded to an existing application (triggering a fresh consultation)
• An appeal notice published on the Inspectorate's website

See also planning appeals: how the process works for objectors and what happens after the planning objection deadline.

---

How to use Planning Guard with these statistics

Understanding that 87% of applications are approved nationally should do two things:

1. Calibrate your expectations — if the development broadly complies with the local plan, the statistical likelihood of refusal is low, regardless of how many people object. Your energy is best spent identifying genuine policy conflicts, not signing petitions.
2. Focus on the 13% — those refusals happen because specific policy tests fail. Your job as an objector is to show the officer why this application fails those tests. Planning Guard's free AI scan analyses your concerns and the application details to identify the specific policy grounds most likely to carry weight with the officer assigned to your case.

The scan is free, no account needed, and takes 3–5 minutes. If there are material grounds, you will see them. If there are not, you will know before investing time in an objection that is unlikely to influence the outcome.

---

Frequently asked questions

What percentage of planning applications are refused in the UK?

In England, approximately 13% of all planning applications are refused. The national grant rate has been around 87% consistently since 2015. Rates vary by council, region, and application type.

Do objections affect approval rates?

Objections do not in themselves determine outcomes — planning is not a vote. However, material planning arguments raised in objections (tied to policy and evidence) can influence officer reports, committee decisions, and the conditions attached to any permission. A well-targeted objection matters; raw numbers of objections do not.

Is planning permission more likely to be refused in London?

Yes. London's overall approval rate (approximately 82%) is lower than the national average (87%). Some boroughs — particularly in east and outer London — record approval rates as low as 66–70%. This reflects London-specific policies, constrained sites, heritage designations, and higher scrutiny of design quality.

What is the most common reason planning permission is refused?

Nationally, the most common reason for refusal is harm to residential amenity — typically loss of daylight, overlooking, overbearing impact, or inadequate privacy separation distances. Design and character of the area is the second most common ground, followed by highways and parking, flood risk, and heritage harm.

Can a refused application be approved on resubmission?

Yes. Many refused applications are resubmitted with amendments and subsequently approved. The refusal reasons in the decision notice tell the applicant exactly what changes are needed. Objectors should monitor the register for resubmissions and submit fresh representations during the new consultation period.

---

Statistics sourced from MHCLG Planning Application Statistics live tables. England and Wales figures. Not legal advice — always verify current data against published government statistics before relying on them in a formal submission.

Use Planning Guard's free AI scan to identify the specific policy grounds that apply to your case — then, if grounds exist, consider an editable letter draft to structure your objection clearly.